People tend to experience better sleep quality when they have increased bedroom ventilation, according to a four-week-long field intervention experiment. The findings, published in Science of The Total Environment, suggest that optimizing bedroom air quality through improved ventilation can lead to more restful nights, with potential implications for our overall well-being.
We all know that a good night’s sleep is essential for our physical and mental well-being. But have you ever considered how the air quality in your bedroom might influence the quality of your sleep? This is precisely what a team of researchers set out to explore in a recent study.
Previous research has hinted at a connection between bedroom air quality and sleep quality, but this study aimed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship. The researchers were particularly interested in the role of ventilation rates in creating optimal sleeping conditions.
“Sleep is crucial for our health, wellbeing and productivity,” said lead author Xiaojun Fan, a postdoctoral researcher at ETH Zürich. “The bedroom is the place where we sleep and spend approximately one third our lifetime. We already investigated and validated the negative effects of inadequate ventilation in bedrooms on sleep quality but only in a laboratory settings. There was a lack of evidence to support this finding in a real-world context with controlled ventilation and other factors.”
To investigate the connection between bedroom ventilation and sleep quality, the researchers conducted a comprehensive study involving 35 participants. These individuals, aged 27 to 64, were carefully selected to ensure they did not have any significant sleep disorders and did not use sleep medication regularly.
The study was conducted in bedrooms located in Belgium, where there were no COVID-19 lockdown or severe pandemic restrictions at that time. All selected bedrooms had centralized mechanical extract ventilation systems that allowed the ventilation rate to be changed without informing the occupants or entering the dwellings.
The study began with a baseline measurement period lasting one week. During this initial week, no interventions were made. This allowed the researchers to establish the natural conditions in each participant’s bedroom, including the existing ventilation rate, air quality, and sleep patterns.
Following the baseline measurement week, the researchers implemented a series of interventions in the form of altered ventilation rates. Over the subsequent three weeks, each participant experienced different ventilation rate conditions: low, moderate, and high. Importantly, the order in which these conditions were applied was carefully balanced to minimize bias and ensure fairness.
Throughout the entire four-week experiment, the researchers continuously monitored various aspects of the bedroom environment and the participants’ sleep patterns. They collected data on parameters such as carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, relative humidity, particulate matter (PM) levels, and temperature. These measurements provided insights into the air quality and conditions in each bedroom.
The researchers found that the ventilation rates had a significant impact on CO2 concentrations. Specifically, CO2 levels were significantly higher at the low ventilation rate setting, which is what you might expect when airflow is restricted. In contrast, the high ventilation rate setting led to lower CO2 levels, indicating better air circulation.
Alongside CO2 concentration, relative humidity also changed with varying ventilation rates. At the low ventilation rate setting, relative humidity was generally higher, while at higher ventilation rates, it decreased slightly. Importantly, the relative humidity levels remained within the 50% to 60% range, which is considered optimal for sleep quality.
The study also looked at the levels of particulate matter (PM2.5), which can affect air quality. At the low ventilation rate setting, PM2.5 concentrations were significantly higher, but they still remained below the recommended guidelines set by the World Health Organization (WHO).
Interestingly, temperature did not vary significantly across the different ventilation rate settings. This suggests that even with changes in ventilation, participants did not experience discomfort due to temperature fluctuations.
The study evaluated sleep quality through objective measurements, including sleep length, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, the percentage of deep sleep, the percentage of light sleep, and the number of awakenings. The results showed that participants generally had good sleep quality. However, there were notable differences when ventilation rates were altered. Increasing ventilation from low to moderate settings resulted in fewer awakenings, increased deep sleep, and reduced light sleep, all indicating improved sleep quality.
“The main tak away for the general public is that increasing bedroom ventilation is conductive to sleep quality, suggesting that they should take actions to improve their bedroom ventilation if it is not good now,” Fan told PsyPost. One effective step they can consider is opening windows, as supported by their previous research.
While this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between bedroom ventilation and sleep quality, it’s important to acknowledge its limitations. One notable limitation is the small sample size, as the study involved 35 participants.
“In this kind of verification study in an actual bedroom context, the findings are not so surprising,” Fan said. “However, the difficulties of running this kind of study were out of my expectations. The recruitment invitation was sent to several thousand potential participants, but <10 % responded.”
“We were supposed to establish a dose-response relationship between bedroom ventilation and sleep quality. Unfortunately, this was not feasible because of the limited data from subjects under three ventilation conditions. Even so, I summarized the current studies on bedroom ventilation in my PhD thesis and found that the upper threshold ventilation rate should result in a CO2 concentration of below 1000 ppm. The exact number requires further investigation.”
While the study has some limitations, it underscores the importance of considering air quality in our sleeping environments for a good night’s rest.
“Pay attention to factors that you may not sense or perceive but are indeed harmful to your health and well-being,” Fan said. “Among others, indoor air quality is one of them, not only because of the health aspect, but also energy since the systems for ventilation are responsible for the majority of energy consumed in buildings.”
The study, “A single-blind field intervention study of whether increased bedroom ventilation improves sleep quality“, was authored by Xiaojun Fan, Chenxi Liao, Kazuya Matsuo, Kevin Verniers, Jelle Laverge, Brecht Neyrinck, Ivan Pollet, Lei Fang, Li Lan, Chandra Sekhar, and Pawel Wargocki.
