What is the best way to give thanks? Study provides key insights

In the pursuit of happiness, gratitude has long been recognized as a powerful tool. Expressing gratitude can lead to improved social relationships, physical health, and psychological well-being, according to a wealth of research. However, a study published in Affective Science delved deeper into the dynamics of gratitude, specifically examining whether it’s more effective when kept private, shared one-to-one with a benefactor, or shared publicly on social media.

The study aimed to shed light on the impact of gratitude interventions in the digital age. It sought to answer whether digital expressions of gratitude have similar effects on well-being as traditional methods. The study also aimed to replicate and expand upon previous research to provide a clearer understanding of how gratitude can be harnessed for personal growth.

Gratitude, as defined in this study, involves recognizing positive outcomes in one’s life that stem from external sources. It’s a concept that has been extensively studied in the past, with various forms of gratitude interventions used to improve well-being.

Gratitude interventions typically take one of two primary forms. The first involves writing down things a person is grateful for, such as beautiful nature or good health. The second, known as the “gratitude visit,” requires participants to write and personally deliver a letter of gratitude to someone who has been especially kind to them. These interventions are designed to boost subjective well-being, which encompasses both positive and negative emotions and overall life satisfaction.

In their new study, Lisa C. Walsh of the University of California at Riverside and her colleagues sought to examine the social aspect of gratitude. The researchers recruited a diverse group of 916 undergraduate students from a large public university.

Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) writing a gratitude letter and not sharing it (private gratitude), (2) sharing gratitude with a benefactor via text (1-to-1 gratitude), (3) sharing gratitude with a benefactor on social media (public gratitude), or (4) tracking their daily activities (control).

Over the course of about a week, participants were asked to complete their assigned activity four times with different people as applicable. The researchers predicted that participants in any gratitude condition would experience improvements in various well-being outcomes compared to the control group. They also expected that sharing gratitude one-to-one might have the most significant impact, as private gratitude lacks social interaction, and public gratitude can have drawbacks like self-censorship.

The study found that participants in any of the gratitude conditions reported significant increases in gratitude, positive emotions, life satisfaction, elevation (a sense of optimism about humanity), connectedness, support, and decreased loneliness compared to the control group. These effects were relatively small but are considered meaningful, especially when accumulated over time.

One interesting finding was that the 1-to-1 gratitude condition, where participants shared gratitude with benefactors via text, showed the most significant increases in social connectedness and support. However, there were no significant differences in well-being outcomes between the various gratitude conditions, suggesting that all forms of expressing gratitude had a positive impact.

The study’s results provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of digital gratitude interventions in promoting well-being. These findings have practical implications, as digital gratitude interventions are easily scalable and can be implemented by individuals, teachers, researchers, coaches, therapists, and organizations.

Despite the strengths of this study, it’s important to acknowledge some limitations. For example, the study mainly focused on college students, and its results may not generalize to the broader population. Additionally, the study did not investigate the long-term durability of the observed effects.

“Overall, the present study shows that digital gratitude interventions helped meaningfully improve students’ well-being—making students feel happier and more satisfied with their lives, as well as more socially connected and less lonely,” the researchers concluded. “… By examining how digital gratitude interventions do (or do not) affect well-being, we hope this study informs researchers and practitioners about how to cultivate and customize future well-being interventions. Namely, future studies could expand on our approach to determine whether such interventions are similarly beneficial in school districts, companies, governmental organizations, and health care settings. Because digital gratitude interventions can be easily implemented online and feasibly delivered to thousands of individuals, they present a potentially useful tool for both researchers and practitioners.”

The study, “What is the Optimal Way to Give Thanks? Comparing the Effects of Gratitude Expressed Privately, One-to-One via Text, or Publicly on Social Media“, was authored by Lisa C. Walsh, Annie Regan, Jean M. Twenge, Sonja Lyubomirsky.

© PsyPost