New security law: Man denied bail under Article 23 over ‘seditious’ slogans on t-shirt and mask

A Hong Kong man was denied bail under the city’s new domestic security law after he allegedly wore a t-shirt with a banned protest slogan and a yellow mask.

West Kowloon Law Courts Building. Photo: GovHK.

Defendant Chu Kai-pong, 27, was brought to the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts on Friday to face one count of “doing with a seditious intention an act or acts that had a seditious intention.” He was also charged with failing to show his proof of identity to the police and loitering with intent.

Hatred and contempt

According to the charge sheet, Chu was intercepted by the police on Wednesday near Shek Mun MTR station. He was said to have worn a top and a mask printed with statements that were allegedly intended to incite hatred, contempt or disaffection against the “fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China.”

The statements also allegedly carried the intent to incite disaffection against the constitutional order and the executive, legislative and judicial authority of Hong Kong. The statements also were intended to incite others to attempt to procure the unlawful alteration of the system set up in accordance with the laws laid down by the Central Authorities, the charge sheet said.

Designated national security judge and Principal Magistrate Victor So refused to grant bail to Chu and ordered him to be remanded into custody. The case was adjourned to August 7 for mention.

The public consultation document for Hong Kong’s homegrown security law, Article 23, on January 30, 2024. Photo: Kyle Lam/HKFP.

According to HKFP’s records, Chu is the first person to be charged under the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance since it was passed in March. HKFP has reached out to the Security Bureau for confirmation.

Protest slogan

Local media reported on Friday that Chu’s t-shirt contained the 2019 protest slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times,” which was ruled as being capable of carrying secessionist connotations in the city’s first national security law trial in 2021.

See also: Explainer: From ‘five demands’ to ‘independence’ – the evolution of Hong Kong’s protest slogans

Chu was also wearing a yellow mask printed with the words “FDNOL.” The phrase is considered an acronym of “Five Demands, Not One Less,” also a slogan from the 2019 extradition bill protests which laid out the movement’s demands.

Hong Kong protesters display a “Five demands, not one less” placard during a demonstration in October 2019. Photo: Studio Incendo.

Protests erupted in June 2019 over a since-axed extradition bill. They escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing’s encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as “riots.”

Article 23

Separate to the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of to up to 16 days, and suspects’ access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city’s opposition-free legislature.

The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and “regressive.” Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to “close loopholes” after the 2019 protests and unrest.

Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team

© Hong Kong Free Press