A political committee leading the charge to pass a constitutional amendment on abortion rights in Florida has urged an appeals court to uphold a circuit judge's decision.
The committee, Floridians Protecting Freedom, demands that the state revamp a "financial impact statement" that will appear on the ballot alongside the proposed amendment.
This statement is meant to provide voters with an estimate of the measure's potential effects on government revenues and the state budget.
Read: Florida Governor DeSantis Vetoes Bill On Water Quality Monitoring And Closures
The stakes are high as the proposed constitutional amendment seeks to enshrine abortion rights in the Florida Constitution, drawing fierce opposition from Governor Ron DeSantis and other Republican leaders in the state.
Floridians Protecting Freedom argues that the current financial impact statement is inaccurate and outdated, given a recent ruling by the Florida Supreme Court that cleared the way for a law restricting abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
The proposed constitutional amendment championed by Floridians Protecting Freedom aims to solidify abortion rights in the Florida Constitution. The measure states that "no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider."
This amendment has been a source of contention, with Governor DeSantis and other Republican leaders in the state voicing their opposition. The political landscape surrounding the issue has become increasingly complex, particularly in light of the recent Florida Supreme Court ruling that cleared the way for a law restricting abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
Read: Safeguarding Florida’s Wildlife: Gov. DeSantis Signs Bill Banning Balloon Releases
In November, a state panel known as the Financial Impact Estimating Conference issued a financial impact statement for the abortion measure. This statement is required to appear on the ballot, providing voters with an estimate of the potential effects of the proposed amendment on government revenues and the state budget.
However, Floridians Protecting Freedom filed a lawsuit seeking a revised statement, arguing that the existing one had become inaccurate and outdated due to the Florida Supreme Court's ruling on the six-week abortion law.
In a June 10th decision, Leon Circuit Judge John Cooper agreed with Floridians Protecting Freedom's argument. He ordered the state to redraft the financial impact statement within 15 days, acknowledging that the previous statement had become inaccurate and misleading in light of the Supreme Court's ruling.
Dissatisfied with the circuit judge's ruling, the state appealed the decision, contending that Cooper did not have the legal authority to order the redrafting of the financial impact statement.
Read: Florida Marijuana Legalization Initiative Heads For November Ballot
In a 64-page brief filed on Tuesday, Floridians Protecting Freedom pushed back against the state's arguments. The committee's attorneys argued that the Florida Constitution requires the financial impact statement to provide the "probable financial impact" and ensure the ballot is clear and accurate.
The committee's attorneys asserted that if the state's position were accepted, it could "put any financial impact statement on the ballot that it pleased, in violation of Florida law and without recourse, no matter how misleading."
At the heart of the legal debate is the question of whether the circuit judge had the authority to order the redrafting of the financial impact statement. The state contends that the judge overstepped his bounds, while Floridians Protecting Freedom argues that the Florida Constitution mandates a clear and accurate statement.
The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for the proposed constitutional amendment on abortion rights. If the appeals court upholds the circuit judge's ruling, the financial impact statement would need to be revised, potentially providing voters with a more accurate and up-to-date assessment of the measure's potential effects.
On the other hand, if the state's appeal is successful, the original financial impact statement could remain on the ballot.
__Help support the Tampa Free Press by making any small donation by clicking here.__
Android Users, Click To Download The Tampa Free Press App And Never Miss A Story. Follow Us On Facebook and Twitter.Sign up for our free newsletter.
